ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 332-336.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同钙调神经蛋白抑制剂治疗肾移植受者的疗效比较

  

  • 出版日期:2014-08-28 发布日期:2014-09-02

A comparison of effect and safety between tacrolimus and cyclosporine in adult renal transplant receipts for 5 years following-up

  • Online:2014-08-28 Published:2014-09-02

摘要:

摘 要 目的:探讨成人肾移植受体使用不同钙调神经蛋白抑制剂5年的疗效与并发症的差异。方法:进行前瞻性实验设计,收集2005年3月至2009年3月我院完成的187例肾移植受体的资料,按免疫抑制方案分为环孢素组(n=67)及他克莫司组(n=120),所有病人随访5年,比较两组受体肾移植术后5年内CNI药物转化率;多毛症发生率;牙龈增生发生率;排斥反应发生率;感染发生率;术后高血压发病率;术后收缩压、舒张压;神经精神症状发生率;术后新发肿瘤发生率;术后糖尿病发病率;血浆胆固醇;血浆三酰甘油;血浆低密度脂蛋白;血浆高密度脂蛋白;肾移植术后估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)情况;患者1,3,5年生存率;肾1,3,5年存活率等方面的差异。结果:术后随访5年结果显示,他克莫司组药物转换率低于环孢素组(11.6% vs 23.9%,P<0.05),他克莫司组糖尿病发生率高于环孢素组(35.8% vs 19.4%,P<0.05),他克莫司组神经精神症状发生率高于环孢霉组(15% vs 4.5%,P<0.05),多毛症比率低于环孢素组(3.3% vs 11.9%,P<0.05),高血压发病率低于环孢素组(72.6% vs 87.3%,P<0.05),舒张压显著低于环孢素组(80.3±13.5mmHg vs 85.1±15.7mmHg,P<0.05)。他克莫司组的高脂血症发病率低于环孢素组(36.7% vs 64.2%,P<0.05),他克莫司组的胆固醇(3.85±2.36 vs 4.73±2.71,P<0.05)及低密度脂蛋白(2.74±2.04 vs 3.36±1.97,P<0.05)显著低于环孢素组,eGFR显著高于于环孢素组(92.5±28.8 ml/min vs 89.7±33.1 ml/min,P<0.05)。其余方面无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:与环孢素比较,他克莫司更高效,副作用相对较少,两组药物疗效及毒副作用各有侧重,临床可根据患者的具体情况个体化用药。

关键词:  他克莫司, 环孢素, 肾移植, 疗效, 并发症

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Objective:To compare effect and safety between tacrolimus and cyclosporine in adult renal transplant receipts for 5 years follow up. Methodology:Between Mar 2005 and Mar 2009, a total of one hundred eighty seven adult renal transplant receipts were selected into this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups according to the using different kinds of CNI: group TAC (n=120) and group CsA (n=67). The time of follow-up was 5 years. The incidence of crossovers, hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, neurological complication, refection, hypertention, and diabetes were observed in two groups,. The levels of blood pressue (systolic and diastolic pressure), serum levels of TC, TG, and LDL were also detected in two groups. The value of eGFR and 5-year survival rate of patient/graft were compared between two groups. Results:The incidence of diabetes(35.8% vs 19.4%,P<0.05) and neurological complication(15% vs 4.5%,P<0.05) in group TAC was significantly higher than that in group CsA. The incidence of crossovers(11.6% vs 23.9%,P<0.05), hirsutism(3.3% vs 11.9%,P<0.05), hyperlipemia(36.7% vs 64.2%,P<0.05),and hypertention(72.6% vs 87.3%,P<0.05)were markedly lower than those in group CsA. The value of diastolic pressure(80.3±13.5mmHg Vs 85.1±15.7mmHg,P<0.05), level of TC(3.85±2.36 vs 4.73±2.71,P<0.05), and level of LDL(2.74±2.04 vs 3.36±1.97,P<0.05) in group TAC were significantly lower than those in Group CsA. The value of eGFR in group TAC were markedly higher than that in Group CsA(92.5±28.8 ml/min vs 89.7±33.1 ml/min,P<0.05). Conclusion:There are some difference in effect and safety between tacrolimus and cyclosporine. CNI shoud be used individualizedly in transplant receipts.

Key words: Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine, Kidney transplantation, Treatment outcome, Complication