ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 519-525.DOI: 10.3969/cndt.j.issn.1006-298X.2016.06.004

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于肌酐和胱抑素C的肾小球滤过率评估方程在老年糖尿病肾病患者的适用性研究

  

  • 出版日期:2016-12-28 发布日期:2017-01-03

Validation study of glomerular filtration rate estimation equations based on creatinine and cystatin C in elderly patients with diabetic nephropathy

  • Online:2016-12-28 Published:2017-01-03

摘要:

目的:探讨3种肾小球滤过率评估方程(CKDEPI2009SCr、CKDEPI2012Cys C、CKDEPI2012SCrCys C)在评价老年糖尿病肾病(DN)患者肾功能方面的临床价值及适用性。
方法:选取2013年1月~2016年5月海南省人民医院肾病风湿科住院的老年DN患者124例,以99mTcDTPA肾动态显像法测定的GFR作为GFR参考值(rGFR),与3种CKDEPI方程估算的GFR(eGFR)进行比较,并应用ROC曲线评价各方程的诊断准确度。
结果:124例DN患者的rGFR水平为(6573±2362)ml/(min·173m2)。3种CKDEPI方程估算的eGFR与rGFR均呈显著相关。BlandAltman图结果显示,3种评估方程与rGFR一致性均不佳,CKDEPI2012SCrCys C方程估算的GFR与rGFR的偏离程度最小。线性回归结果显示,CKDEPI2012SCrCys C方程估算GFR与X轴的斜率较其他方程更小,其估算GFR的30%准确性>70%。在慢性肾脏病不同分期中,CKDEPI2012SCrCys C方程估算GFR的15%准确性、30%准确性及50%准确性均较高,其估算的eGFR与rGFR的偏差及偏离测量值较小。ROC曲线结果显示,各评估方程的曲线下面积(AUC)及95%CI分别为0882(0806~0952)、0876(0796~0934)、0918(0843~0986),其中CKDEPI2012SCrCys C方程的敏感度和特异度均较高。
结论:CKDEPI2012SCrCys C方程估算GFR的准确性优于CKDEPI2009SCr方程和CKDEPI2012Cys C方程,但一致性限度均超过了可接受的专业界值。

Abstract:

Objective:To investigate the clinical value and application of 3  glomerular filtration rate estimation equations(CKDEPI2009SCr、CKDEPI2012Cys C、CKDEPI2012SCrCys C)in elderly patients with diabetic nephropathy(DN).
Methodology:One hundred and twentyfour patients with diabetic nephropathy who were hospitalized with GFR being measured by dynamic renal imaging with 99mTcDTPA from January 2013 to May 2016 were enrolled in this study. GFR was measured by 99mTcDTPA renal dynamic imaging method as GFR reference standard(rGFR), the GFR values estimated by the 3 CKDEPI equations were compared, and the diagnostic accuracy of each prediction equation was evaluated by ROC curve.
Results:rGFR levels in 124 DN patients were(6573±2362)ml/(min·173m2). Estimation of glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)by 3 CKDEPI equations were significantly correlated with rGFR(r=0742,P=0000;r=0713,P=0000;r=0816,P=0000). The results of BlandAltman diagram showed that the consistency of the 3 evaluation equations was not good, the deviation degree of eGFR and rGFR from the CKDEPI2012SCrCys C equation was the least. Linear regression results showed that the CKDEPI2012SCrCys C equation estimated GFR and slope of X axis was smaller than other equations, and its estimated GFR of 30% accuracy>70%. In the different stages of chronic kidney disease(CKD), the CKDEPI2012SCrCys C equation estimated GFR of 15% accuracy, 30% accuracy and 50% accuracy were higher, its estimated of GFR and rGFR deviation and deviation from the measured value were small. According to the result of the ROC curve, the evaluation equation of AUC and 95%CI respectively 0882(0806~0952)、0876(0796~0934)、0918(0843~0986), which CKDEPI2012SCrCys C equation for sensitivity and specificity were higher.
Conclusion:The accuracy of theCKDEPI2012SCrCys C equation for estimate GFR is better than that of the CKDEPI2009SCr equation and CKDEPI2012Cys C equation in elderly DN patients, but the consistency limit exceeds the acceptable professional value.