ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 107-112.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于肌酐和胱抑素C的肾小球滤过率评估公式判断2型糖尿病肾病的预后

  

  • 出版日期:2016-04-28 发布日期:2016-05-04

Prediction of renal outcome by estimating GFR from a combination of serum creatinine and cystatin C in type 2 diabetic nephropathy

  • Online:2016-04-28 Published:2016-05-04

摘要:

摘要
目的:比较三种肾小球滤过率(GFR)计算方法(eGFRcre,eGFRcys与eGFRcrecys),用于评价2型糖尿病肾病患者肾功能的准确性及在判断预后中的临床价值。方法:观察性研究共纳入2型糖尿病肾病随访登记数据库中501例患者,通过横断面分析,比较0、12、24月时用eGFRcre,eGFRcys与eGFRcrecys公式计算得到eGFR的分布及偏移状态,并随访观察12月和24月时不同eGFR下降幅度(20%,30%,40%,和57%)对判断患者肾脏终点事件的敏感性和特异性。结果:将eGFRcrecys设为参考,eGFRcre公式高估了GFR水平,在eGFRcrecys>120, 90-120, 60-90, 30-60,<30ml/min/1.73m2的2型糖尿病肾病患者中,中位偏移分别为-0.21,6.17,12.69,9.55,5.27 ml/min/1.73m2。低龄、高收缩压、低体质指数(BMI)和高血糖增加偏移度。基于eGFRcrecys公式24月的GFR下降速率较eGFRcre和eGFRcys公式更好的判断肾脏终点,曲线下面积(ROC)分别为0.857 ±0.0297,0.839±0.0319和0.796 ±0.0357。eGFRcrecys24月的GFR下降速率联合基线eGFRcrecys的GFR水平可以有效判断肾脏预后,ROC 达0.917± 0.0178。基线eGFR crecys>90ml/min/1.73m2的患者,以eGFRcrecys24月下降57%作为判断指标,敏感性和特异性均为100%;基线eGFRcrecys <90ml/(min.1.73m2)的患者,以 eGFRcrecys24月下降40%作为判断预后指标,其准确性更好。结论:在2型糖尿病肾病中,eGFRcre公式可能高估患者的GFR,尤其在eGFR60-120 ml/(min.1.73m2)的人群中。以eGFRcrecys公式计算的24月GFR下降57%和40%分别用于基线eGFRcrecys>90和<90ml/(min.1.73m2)的患者用于判断2型糖尿病肾病的肾脏预后的敏感性和特异性较好。

关键词: 胱抑素C, 肾小球滤过率, 2型糖尿病肾病, CKD-EPI公式, 肾脏预后

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate estimated GFR from combination of serum creatinine and cystatin C as marker to predict long-term renal outcome in patient with Type 2 diabetic nephropathy (DN). Methodology: Five hundred one patients with DN were enrolled in this study. The levels of eGFRcre, eGFRcys, eGFRcrecys were assessed at baseline, 12, and 24 month. After the follow-up time of median 31 months, the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) risk related to percentage change in estimated GFR over one and 2 years were compared to the three equations. Result: compared with eGFRcrecys, eGFRcre overestimated GFR in DN. The absolute bias was -0.21,6.17,12.69,9.55,5.27 ml/min/1.73m2 when eGFRcrecys>120 ml/(min.1.73m2), 90~120 ml/(min.1.73m2), 60~90 ml/(min.1.73m2), 30~60 ml/(min.1.73m2),<30ml/(min.1.73m2), respectively. Lower age, higher systolic blood pressure, lower body mass index, and increased fast blood glucose contributed to the bias. eGFRcrecys slope over 2 year was superior to eGFRcre or eGFRcys to predict renal outcome, whose area under curve ( AUC ) was 0.857 ±0.0297 and the ROC of eGFRcrecys slope over 2 year combined with baseline eGFRcrecys was further increased to 0.917± 0.0178. Baseline eGFRcrecys >90ml/(min.1.73m2), 57% reduction over 2 years as an alternative end point, the sensitivity and specificity was 100%; Baseline eGFRcrecys <90 ml/(min.1.73m2), 40% reduction over 2 years could be an idea alternative end point. Conclusion: eGFRcre overestimated GFR in the patients with DN, in particular eGFR less than 120ml/(min.1.73m2), 57% reduction over 2 years in baseline eGFRcrecys > 90ml/(min.1.73m2) and 40% reduction over 2 years in baseline eGFRcrecys < 90ml/(min.1.73m2) could be an idea alternative end point to predict ESRD.

Key words: cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate, type 2 diabetic nephropathy, CKD-EPI, renal prognosis