ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 241-246.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-298X.2026.03.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字减影血管造影实时引导下导丝复位技术在腹膜透析导管移位中的应用

  

  • 出版日期:2026-06-29 发布日期:2026-07-02

Application of guide wire reset technique under digital subtraction angiography real-time guidance in peritoneal dialysis catheter malposition

  • Online:2026-06-29 Published:2026-07-02

摘要: 目的:评估在数字减影血管造影(DSA)实时引导下用0.035英寸超滑加硬导丝对腹膜透析(PD)导管进行复位的技术可行性及安全性。  方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年7月在苏州大学附属第二医院经泌尿系统平片(KUB)摄影明确诊断为导管移位的32例PD患者相关临床资料,采用0.035英寸超滑加硬导丝在DSA实时引导下对PD导管进行复位,统计复位的成功率并总结复位失败原因,记录手术时间及 X 线透视时间,统计相关并发症,随访12个月内PD导管的通畅性及腹膜炎发生率。  结果:32例患者中30例成功复位,复位成功率93.75%, 有2例复位失败,1例结合腹部CT结果考虑 PD导管位于肠管之间,末端位于后腹膜,反复尝试均未能成功复位;另一例为 PD 导管末端进入真骨盆后注射造影剂提示造影剂局限于PD导管局部,透析液引流缓慢,考虑网膜包裹,后行腹腔镜手术证实为大网膜包裹。手术平均时间为 26.3±7.4 min,X 线透视时间 11.5±2.2 min,3例患者术中出现腹痛,所有患者术后均未发生PD相关性腹膜炎,4例患者术后出现恶心,未见其他明显并发症。30例复位成功者 12 个月内随访有1例患者再次发生移位,其余29例PD导管引流均通畅,未再出现导管移位,也未发生PD相关性腹膜炎。  结论:采用DSA实时引导下导丝复位PD导管的技术可行性高,安全性良好,手术操作时间短,且微创,无明显并发症,对于常规方法不能复位的导管移位避免了二次手术的创伤,值得在临床进一步推广。

关键词: 腹膜透析, 数字减影血管造影, 导管移位, 导丝

Abstract:  Objective:To evaluate the technical feasilility and safety of using a 0.035-inch super-slippery stiff guidewire to reposition displaced peritoneal dialysis (PD) cathetersunder real-time digital subtraction angiography (DSA) guidance. Methods:We conducted a retrospective analysisof the clinical data of 32 PD patients diagnosed with peritoneal catheter malposition by kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) radiography at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2021 to July 2022. A 0.035-inch super-slipperystiff guidewire was used to reposition the PD catheter under real-time DSA guidance, We calculated the success rate of repositioning, summarized the causes of failure, recorded the procedure time and X-ray fluoroscopy time, documented related complications, and followed up catheter patency and PD- related peritonitis for 12 months. Results:Successful repositioning of the PD catheter tip into the true pelvis was achieved in 30 of the 32 patients, yielding a primary success rate of93.75%. Repositioning failed in two patients. In the first patient, abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed thatthe catheter was located between intestinal loops with its tip in the retroperitoneal space; repeated attempts failed to advancee it into the true pelvis. In the second patient, although the catheter was initially advanced into the true pelvis, contrast innjection showed localized pooling around the catheter tip, and dialysate drainage was slow. Laparoscopy confirmed omentalwrapping around the catheter. The mean procedure time was26.3+7.4 min, and the mean fluoroscopy time was 11.52.2 min. During the procedure, three patients experienced mild abdominal pain or discomfort. No PD-related peritonitis occurred immediately after the procedure. Four patients reported nausea and discomfort postoperatively. No other procedure-related complications were observed. During the 12- month follow-up, one of the 30 successfully repositioned patients experienced catheter remigration, while the remaining 29 maintained unobstructed drainage without recurrent migrationor PD-associated peritonitis. Conclusion: The technique of repositioning displaced PD catheters using a 0.035-inch supper-slippery stiff guidewire under real-time DSA guidance is technically feasible, safe, minimally invasive, and associatedwith short procedure time and no major complications. For PD catheters that cannot be repositioned by conventional methods, this approach can avoid the trauma of open surgical revision and is worthy of further clinical promotion.

中图分类号: