ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 525-530.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-298X.2022.06.005

• • 上一篇    下一篇

尿素清除指数联合尿素清除体积评估血液透析充分性

CHEN Chen,XU Yan,CAI Zhonglin,LI Ye,HU Mengtian,MA Chunyuan   

  • 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-04

Kt/V combined with Kt in assessing dialysis adequacy of hemodialysis patients

  • Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-04

摘要: 目的:探讨尿素清除指数(Kt/V)联合尿素清除体积(Kt)评估血液透析(HD)充分性的必要性和合理性,分析影响HD充分性评价指标可靠性的因素。
方法:采用单中心、横断面、前瞻性的研究设计,选取苏州市第九人民医院192例维持性血液透析(MHD)治疗的患者作为研究对象。检测单次透析前后血尿素氮,使用Daugirdas公式计算单室尿素清除指数(spKt/V)和Lowrie公式计算目标尿素清除体积(tKt),根据Kt/V和Kt达标情况进行分组,分析和探讨HD充分性指标与临床参数之间的关系,采用Logistic回归分析Kt/V的影响因素。
结果:平均Kt/V值162±046,Kt/V达标率6510%;平均Kt值5353±1588 L,Kt达标率5313%;根据Kt/V分组比较:Kt/V未达标组Kt值低于Kt/V达标组(4637±689 L vs 5736±1791 L,t=-608,P<001);Kt/V未达标组尿素分布容积(V)高于Kt/V达标组(3796±518 L vs 3110±490 L,t=907,P<001)。根据Kt/V和Kt联合分组,即A组(Kt/V和Kt均达标)、B组(Kt/V和Kt均不达标)、C组(Kt/V达标和Kt未达标)和D组(Kt/V不达标和Kt达标),四组患者占比分别为5000%、3021%、1667%和313%。A组Kt值最高6138±1868 L。D组V值最高4267±273 L。透析方式(OR=619)、V(OR=1413)、Kt(OR=2934)和基础代谢率(OR=019)是影响Kt/V的独立危险因素。
结论:Kt/V联合Kt评估发现了“透析相对充分”和“透析相对不充分”的特殊人群,可以更全面、客观地评估患者的透析充分性。


关键词: 血液透析, 透析充分性, 尿素清除指数, 尿素清除体积

Abstract: Objective:To explore the necessity and rationality of evaluating hemodialysis adequacy by urea clearance index (Kt/V) combined with volume of urea clearecl (Kt), in order to analyze the factors affecting hemodialysis adequacy.
Methodology:Using singlecenter, crosssectional and prospective study design, hemodialysis adequacy was assessed, and the hemodialysis patients were selected as research subjects from Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital. Blood samples were collected for testing before and after dialysis; singlepool Kt/V was calculated according to the daugirdas formula. targetKt was calculated according to the Lowrie’s formula.The study was grouped according to the compliance of Kt/V and Kt, and the relationship between hemodialysis adequacy and clinical parameters was analyzed. Meanwhile, the factors affecting Kt/V were analyzed by using logistic regression.
Results:The Kt/V value was 162±046, and the number of Kt/V who met the standard was 125(6510%); The Kt value was 5353±1588 L, and the number of Kt who met the standard was 102 (5313%).the Kt value of Kt/V nonstandard group was lower than that of Kt/V standard group (4637±689 L vs 5736±1791 L,t=-608,P<001); the value of V in Kt/V nonstandard group was higher than that in Kt/V standard group (3796±518 L vs 3110±490 L,t=907,P<001). Patients were divided into four groups based on whether Kt/V and Kt were met the criteria, and they were Group A (Kt/V and Kt are both up to standard), Group B (Kt/V and Kt are not up to standard), Group C (Kt/V was up to but Kt was not up to standard) and Group D (Kt/V was not up to but Kt was up to standard). The proportions of patients in the four group was as follows: 5000%、3021%、1667% and 313%. Among them, Group A has the highest Kt value(6138±1868) L。Group D has the highest V value(4267±273)L。Logistic regression analysis results shows that: Dialysis mode(OR=619)、V(OR=1413)、Kt(OR=2934)and BMR(OR=019)are independent risk factors which can affect Kt/V.
Conclusion:Kt/V combined with Kt can identify special populations that are “relatively adequate” and “relatively inadequate”. Kt/V combined with Kt can more assess the sufficiency of Hemodialysis adequacy comprehensively and objectively.

Key words: hemodialysis, hemodialysis adequacyKt, Kt/V