ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 114-119.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-298X.2022.02.003

• • 上一篇    下一篇

肌酐全年龄段方程在老年慢性肾脏病患者肾小球滤过率评估中的价值

  

  • 出版日期:2022-04-28 发布日期:2022-04-21

Full age spectrum equation in evaluation of glomerular filtration rate in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease

  • Online:2022-04-28 Published:2022-04-21

摘要: 目的:评价肌酐全年龄段(FAS)方程评估老年慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者肾小球滤过率(GFR)的价值及意义。
方法:选择海南医学院第一附属医院确诊的老年CKD患者191例,以99mTcDTPA肾动态显像法为标准测量GFR(TcGFR),基于血清肌酐(SCr)和血清胱抑素C(CysC)水平分别采用FAS三方程和CKD流行病合作工作组(CKDEPI)方程估算GFR(eGFR),分别记录为eGFR1、eGFR2、eGFR3、eGFR4。比较四方程eGFR与TcGFR的相关性、方程的偏倚,依据性别、年龄段及CKD分期进行分层,对四方程与TcGFR及四方程之间进行两两比较。评估四方程评价CKD老年患者GFR水平的适用性、灵敏度、特异度、15%及30%(P15、P30)的准确性、精确度等。
结果:各方程eGFR与TcGFR均呈显著正相关,eGFR4与TcGFR相关性最好(r=0786),其次为eGFR3;eGFR2的偏倚最小,eGFR3次之。精确度最高的方程为eGFR3,其次为eGFR2。P15的准确性依次为eGFR3>eGFR2>eGFR4>eGFR1,P30的准确性依次为eGFR2>eGFR3>eGFR4>eGFR1。BlandAltman散点图显示:eGFR4的95%CI小于eGFR3;其次为eGFR2和eGFR1。四方程的曲线下面积(AUC)大小依次为eGFR2>eGFR4>eGFR3>eGFR1。分层结果显示,女性CKD 1~3期适用eGFR2;CKD 4~5期,适用eGFR1、GFR3;年龄≥70岁时适用eGFR3。男性CKD 1~3期患者,适用eGFR2,年龄≥70岁时也可选择eGFR4;CKD 4~5期,eGFR1、eGFR3和eGFR4方程均可,年龄≥70岁时适用eGFR3。
结论:FAS方程估算本地区老年CKD患者eGFR,优于CKDEPI,在不同年龄段、不同性别及不同CKD分期中优选方案不同,可根据相应的区间选择合适的方程作为入院后未进行肾动态显像的替代估算方法。


关键词: 肌酐全年龄段方程, 慢性肾脏病, 肾小球滤过率, 血清肌酐, 血清胱抑素C

Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the value and significance of full age spectrum (FAS) equation in evaluation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Methodology:A total of 191 elderly patients with CKD confirmed in our hospital were selected, and the GFR was calculated and recorded as TcGFR using the 99mTcDTPA renal dynamic imaging method as the standard. Based on serum creatinine (SCr) and cystatin C (CysC) levels, three FAS equations and CKDEPI equations were used to estimate GFR, which were recorded as eGFR1, eGFR2, eGFR3 and eGFR4, respectively. The correlation between eGFR and TcGFR calculated by the four equations and the bias of the equation were compared. and the four equations were compared with TcGFR and each other according to gender, age and CKD stage, the applicability, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of 15% and 30% of GFR in elderly patients with CKD were compared by the four equations.
Results:eGFR and TcGFR calculated by all equations are significantly positively correlated. eGFR4 has the best correlation with TcGFR (r=0786), followed by eGFR3; The bias of eGFR2 is the smallest, followed by eGFR3; The most accurate equation is eGFR3, followed by eGFR2; The accuracy of P15 is eGFR3>eGFR2>eGFR4>eGFR1, and the accuracy of P30 is eGFR2>eGFR3>eGFR4>eGFR1; The BlandAltman scatter diagram shows that the 95% consistency range of eGFR3 is less than eGFR4; followed by eGFR2 and eGFR1;The area under the curve (AUC) of the four equations is eGFR2>eGFR4>eGFR3>eGFR1; the AUC of eGFR2 is the largest. Stratified results showed that eGFR2 was applicable to female in CKD13 stage; In CKD45 stage eGFR1 and eGFR3 are applicable; eGFR3 is applicable when older than 70 years old; For male in CKD13 stage, eGFR2 is applicable, and eGFR4 can also be selected when olde than 70 years old; In CKD45 stage, eGFR1, eGFR3 and eGFR4 equations can be used. eGFR3 is applicable when the age is older than 70 years old.
Conclusion:FAS equation is better than CKDEPI equation in estimating eGFR of elderly patients in this area. The optimal schemes are different in different age groups, different genders and different stages of CKD. The appropriate equation can be selected according to the corresponding interval as an alternative estimation method without renal dynamic imaging after admission.


Key words: full age spectrum equation, chronic kidney disease, glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, serum ystatin C