ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 530-535.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环内皮细胞损伤标记物与抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关血管炎活动性的联系

  

  • 出版日期:2011-12-28 发布日期:2011-12-20

  • Online:2011-12-28 Published:2011-12-20

摘要:

摘 要  目的:探讨外周血液中内皮细胞损伤标记物循环内皮细胞(CECs)数量、可溶性血栓调节蛋白(sTM)、血浆血管性假血友病因子(vWF)、E-选择素(E-selectin)和血管细胞黏附分子(VCAM-1)水平与ANCA相关血管炎(AAV)活动性的联系。 方法: 84例AAV患者,根据血管炎活动性分为活动组(n=56,男性23例,女性33例,平均年龄48.1± 16.8岁, BVAS评分13.6± 2.4分)和缓解组(n=28,男性9例,女性19例,平均年龄50.2± 16.4岁,BVAS评分0分),血管炎活动性评分采用伯明翰评分(BVAS)。性别、年龄相匹配健康志愿者20名为健康对照组。免疫磁珠分离方法检测CECs数量,ELISA法检测血浆sTM、vWF、E-selectin和VCAM-1水平。比较三组CECs、vWF、E-selectin、sTM和VCAM-1水平的差异。 结果:活动组CECs、sTM、vWF和E-selectin水平均显著高于健康对照组(P<0.01)。缓解组血CECs、sTM、vWF和E-selectin与健康对照组比较无显著差异,活动组和缓解组血浆VCAM-1水平与健康对照组比较均无显著差异。与缓解组比较,活动组CECs(30±12 vs 17±5个/ml,P<0.01)与sTM(9.5±6.8 vs 6.1±3.4 ng/ml,P<0.01)水平显著升高,但经Scr校正后,两组间sTM水平无显著差异。两组间血浆vWF和E-selectin也无显著差异(P>0.05)。活动组sTM水平与血肌酐和尿蛋白水平呈正相关性, CECs、vWF、E-selectin和VCAM-1水平与血肌酐和尿蛋白无相关性。 结论:循环内皮细胞数量与血管炎活动性密切相关,可作为临床判断ANCA相关血管炎病情的重要指标。

关键词: 内皮细胞损伤标记物  循环内皮细胞 , 血管炎 抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体

Abstract:

Objective:To detect various endothelial markers of circulating endothelial cells(CECs), soluble thrombomodulin(sTM), von Willebrand factor(vWF), E-selectin and Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1(VCAM-1) in patients with active and remission stage of ANCA associated vasculitis, and to explore the relationship between endothelial markers and the activity of ANCA associated vasulitis (AAV). Methodology: Fifty six patients with AAV in active phase (M:23, F:33, mean age 48.1± 16.8y, BVAS score 13.6± 2.4), 28 patients in remission phase (M:9, F:19, mean age 50.2± 16.4y, BVAS score 0), and 20 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. The CECs were isolated from peripheral blood by use of Dynabeads coated with antibodies against CD146,and the plasma sTM, vWF, E-selectin and ignificance of VCAM-1 were detected with ELISA. Results: CECs, vWF, E-selectin and sTM levels, but not VCAM-1, were higher in the active phase of AAV than that in controls (P<0.01), no significant differences of endothelial markers were found between AAV patients in remission and controls. The CECs (30±1 vs 17±5.0 cells/ml, P<0.01) and levels of plasma sTM (9.5±6.8vs 6.1±3.4 ng/ml,P<0.01) were significant increased in active AAV patients than that in remission, whereas corrected for renal function, sTM did not significant, and plasma vWF and E-selectin levels showed no significant differences between patients in active phase and in remission patients. The sTM level in the active phase was positive related with serum creatinine and urine protein, while elevated sTM levels were associated with higher serum creatinine levels. The endothelial markers had no relation with crescents and fibrinoid necrotic lesion.  Conclusion: Circulating endothelial cells is potential biomarker in evaluating the activity of ANCA associated vasulitis.