ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 301-306.

• 论文 •    下一篇

激素联合赛可平和他克莫司治疗狼疮性肾炎的前瞻性临床研究

  

  • 出版日期:2011-08-31 发布日期:2011-09-01

A prospective clinical trail of corticosteroids in combination with mycophenolate mofetil dispersible tablets and tacrolimus for the induction treatment of lupus nephritis

  • Online:2011-08-31 Published:2011-09-01

摘要:

目的:前瞻性观察激素联合赛可平(吗替麦考酚酯分散片,MMF)和他克莫司(FK506)(多靶点组)诱导治疗狼疮性肾炎(LN)的疗效及安全性,并与激素联合环磷酰胺静脉冲击疗法(IV-CYC)进行比较。方法:79例经肾活检确诊的IV、V+IV和V+III型LN患者随机分为多靶点组(n=45)和IV-CYC组(n=34)。两组患者均先使用甲基泼尼松龙静脉冲击治疗后口服强的松。多靶点组中MMF(杭州中美华东制药有限公司)治疗剂量1g/d,MMF血药浓度(MPA-AUC0~12h)目标值为20-30 mg·h /L;FK506(杭州中美华东制药有限公司)剂量 4mg/d,FK506谷浓度维持4-7ng/ml。IV-CYC组CYC剂量0.5-0.75g/m2BSA,每月1次。诱导治疗疗程6-9个月。疗效主要指标为完全缓解率(定义为尿蛋白<0.4g/24h,血清白蛋白≥35g/l,血肌酐正常,无肾外活动),次要指标为部分缓解率(定义为尿蛋白较基础值减少50%以上且尿蛋白<3.5g/24h、血清白蛋白≥30g/l,血肌酐稳定)和不良反应发生率。比较两组的临床疗效和不良反应。结果:多靶点组(女39例,男6例,平均年龄25.1±9.3岁)与IV-CYC组(女30例,男4例,平均年龄30.4±8.9岁)的基础临床指标和病理类型无统计学差异。诱导期间多靶点组累积完全缓解率显著高于IV-CYC组(P<0.05),诱导6月(53.3% vs 29.4% P<0.05)和9月(62.2% vs 42.6%,P<0.05)的治疗完全缓解率多靶点组均显著高于IV-CYC组。多靶点组IV+V型的完全缓解率显著高于IV-CYC组(50.0% vs 16.7%,P<0.05),V+III型的完全缓解率也高于IV-CYC(54.5% vs 22.2%,P>0.05)。IV型LN两组缓解率无差异。多靶点组总不良反应发生率低于IV-CYC(31.1% vs 70.6%,P<0.01),其中多靶点组的主要不良反应为高血压(11.1%)和带状疱疹(6.7%),IV-CYC组的主要不良反应为胃肠道反应(23.5%)、白细胞减少(13.7%)和皮肤感染(8.8%)。两组分别有2例和1例并发肺部感染,无一例死亡。结论:激素联合赛可平和他克莫司组成的多靶点疗法,治疗狼疮性肾炎的疗效优于CYC静脉冲击疗法,尤其对V+IV型疗效更为显著,不良反应发生率低。多靶点疗法的临床疗效和对远期预后的影响还需要多中心和长期随访的临床研究。

Abstract:

Objective: To prospectively observe the clinical efficacy and safety of Corticosteroids in combination with mycophenolate mofetil dispersible tablets (Cicopin○R,MMF, Hangzhou Zhongmei Huadong pharmaceutical Co, Ltd) and tacrolimus (FK506, Hangzhou Zhongmei Huadong pharmaceutical Co, Ltd) (multi-target group) in the induction treatment for lupus nephritis (LN).  Methodology: Seventy-nine patients with biopsy confirmed class IV, V + IV and V + III LN were randomly assigned to either multi-target group (n= 45, 39 females, 6 males, mean age 25.1±9.3 years) or intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy(IV-CYC)(n = 34, 30 females, 4 males, mean age 30.4 ± 8.9 years). All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by oral prednisone. In multi-target group, the dose of MMF and FK506 was adjusted based on the blood level with the MPA-AUC0 ~ 12h level of 20-30 mg • h /L and FK506 trough level 4-7ng/ml. In IV-CYC group, CYC was given in a dose 0.5-0.75g/m2BSA monthly. The induction period was 6months or 9 months according the responses to the therapy. Primary efficacy parameter was complete remission rate (defined as urine protein <0.4g/24h, serum albumin ≥ 35g/l, normal serum creatinine and no extra-renal activity), the secondary parameters were partial remission rate (defined as urinary protein than the base value reduced by 50% or more, and urine protein <3.5g/24h, serum albumin ≥ 30g/l, serum creatinine stable) and incidence of adverse reactions. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were compared between two groups.  Results: The baseline clinical and histological classes had no siginificant differences between multi-target group and IV-CYC group. The accumulated complete remission rate of multi-target group was significantly higher than IV-CYC group (P <0.05) during the induction period. At 6months and 9 months, the complete remission rate was 53.3% and 62.2% respectively in the multi-target group, and 29.4% and 42.6%, in IV-CYC group respectively. Also, Multi-target therapy showed much higher complete remission rate  than IV-CYC therapy for class V+IV (50.0% vs 16.7%, P<0.05) and class V + III(54.5% vs 22.2 %, P> 0.05). In class IV LN, no difference of the remission rate was found between the two groups. The incidence of adverse events in the multi-target group was much lower than that in the IV-CYC group (31.1% vs 70.6%, P <0.01), the major adverse events were new-onset hypertension (11.1%) and herpes zoster (6.7%) in the multi-target group, gastrointestinal reactions (23.5%), leukopenia (13.7%) and skin infections (8.8%) in the IV-CYC group. Three patients( 2 in multi-target group and 1 in IV-CYC group) complicated with pulmonary infection, none died.  Conclusion: The multi-target therapy, which is composed of corticosteroids with Cicopin and tacrolimus, showed more effective than intravenous CYC pulse therapy in inducing remission of lupus nephritis, especially class V+IV, and had a more favorable safety. Howere, multi-center clinical trials are encouraged to evaluate the clinical efficacy and the impact on long-term survival for lupus nephritis.

Key words: mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, multi-target therapy, , lupus nephritis