ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 26-31.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

影响腹膜透析患者残余肾功能下降速率的因素

  

  • 出版日期:2015-02-28 发布日期:2015-03-07

Analysis of the rate of residual renal function decline in peritoneal dialysis patients with different baseline residual renal function

  • Online:2015-02-28 Published:2015-03-07

摘要:

摘 要 目的:比较基线时不同残余肾功能(RRF)的腹膜透析(PD)患者的 RRF下降速率,分析RRF下降的相关影响因素。 方法:选取行 PD置管术的201例新患者,根据肾小球滤过率(eGFR)水平将其分为A组(eGFR<6 ml/min)、B组eGFR(6-10ml/min)、C组(eGFR>10ml/min)。至少每6个月对患者进行一次临床随访,评估患者的全身情况及透析状态,并计算36个随访月每组 RRF的平均下降速率。 结果:A、B、C三组的 RRF平均下降速率分别为-0.089,-0.152,-0.247(ml/min/month, P<0.001)。多元线性回归显示基线时心胸比( rs= -0.238);三酰甘油( rs= -0.421)、eGFR( rs= -0.557)、血红蛋白( rs= 0.216)分别是 B、C组 rGFR下降速率的独立影响因素(A组没有纳入变量)。在随访末,C组 RRF仍然保持最高的水平且 RRF消失的百分比在3组中最低(P <0.001), 且心力衰竭发生的时间较晚。结论:基线时eGFR高的 PD患者 RRF下降速率快,但其随访末在3组中仍然保持最高的 RRF水平及最低的 RRF消失百分比。

关键词: 腹膜透析, 残余肾功能, 下降速率, 相关因素

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the residual renal function (RRF) decline in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with different baseline residual renal function and explore its relative factors. Methodology: Two hundred one new PD patients were enrolled in this study. They were divided into three groups according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR):group A was eGFR <6 ml/min (n=60), group B eGFR 6-10ml/min (n=91), and group C eGFR >10ml/min (n=50). During the follow up, we regularly examined laboratory measurements, and dialysis status was evaluated. The average rate of RRF decline was calculated in three groups after follow-up of 36 months. Results: The average rate of RRF decline was -0.089, -0.152, -0.247(ml/min/month) respectively on group A, group B and group C (P<0.001). By linear multiple regression analysis, the independent factors for the decline of RRF were cardiothoracic ratio (rs= -0.238) in group B, triglyceride (rs= -0.421), eGFR (rs= -0.557) and hemoglobin (rs= 0.216) in group C ( no independent factor was in group A ). At the end of follow-up, the average of RRF in group C was still maximum and the patients have no RRF with the lowest percentage among three groups (P <0.001), and their heart failure occurs later . Conclusion: The RRF declined fastest in the patients with highest baseline RRF, but they maintained the highest RRF at the end of follow-up and have no RRF with the lowest percentage among three groups.

Key words: peritoneal dialysis, residual renal function, decline rate, relative factors