ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 204-211.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

组合式连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过胆红素吸附系统在高胆红素血症治疗中的应用

  

  • 出版日期:2011-06-30 发布日期:2011-08-08

Combined CVVH-bilirubin adsorption therapy on patients with hyperbilirubinemia

  • Online:2011-06-30 Published:2011-08-08

摘要:

目的:观察组合式CVVH-胆红素吸附治疗高胆红素血症患者的临床疗效与安全性,并与传统血浆分离灌流治疗进行对比。  方法:16例高胆红素血症患者,共接受55例次胆红素吸附治疗,所有患者首次治疗均采用常规血浆分离后灌流的方法(常规法),血流量100-120ml/min,血浆分离速度30-40ml/min;其后采用组合式CVVH-胆红素吸附治疗(组合法),血流量200-250ml/min,血浆分离速度90ml/min;分离血浆成份经CVVH血滤器(AV600)滤过,超滤率66ml/min,浓缩血浆成份再经BRS-350吸附柱吸附后回输体内。同时应用前稀释方式在EC40W血浆成份分离器前输入碳酸氢盐置换液(4000ml/h)。治疗时间均为8h。治疗中检测治疗前、后血生化和凝血四项,及治疗开始后30min,2h,4h,6h及8h血浆分离器前、吸附柱BRS-350前后血及血浆生化。记录患者临床生命体征。同时进行单次治疗前、后急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分(APACHEII)、Glasgow昏迷评分及肝功能MELD评分。   结果:常规法单次治疗后总胆红素(TBL),直接胆红素(DBL),间接胆红素(IDBL),总胆汁酸(TBA)下降率分别为(46.1±8.3)%,(47.3±8.0)%,(40.7±24.8)%,(36.5±5.2)% ,组合式CVVH-胆红素吸附单次治疗后TBL,DBL,IDBL,TBA下降率分别为(54.4±5.2)%,(54.2±5.3)%,(63.8±7.2)%, (47.6±14.7)%。常规法治疗开始后0.5h,2h,4h对TBL清除率分别为(22.3±2.2)ml/min,(12.2±4.4)ml/min,(9.0±2.8)ml/min,;组合法对应的时间对TBL的清除率分别为(28.7±13.1)ml/min,,(21.9±9.1)ml/min,(16.1±4.3)ml/min,至治疗结束时,两种方法对TBL清除率分别为(8.3±3.0)ml/min,(9.3±4.1)ml/min。两种方法对TBL,DBL,IDBL的清除率(ml/min)均随时间呈下降趋势。常规法单次治疗后总蛋白(TP),白蛋白(ALB)较治疗前降低,APTT,PT,INR均较治疗前延长。组合法单次治疗后血尿素氮(BUN),肌酐(Scr),谷丙转氨酶(ALT),谷草转氨酶(AST)均有下降,对TP, ALB,凝血功能无影响。组合法治疗后患者收缩压、心率,临床APACHEII有所改善,MELD评分改善显著。患者ICU30天存活率达69%,出院存活率56%。两种方法治疗过程中患者生命体征平稳,无不良事件发生。  结论:组合式CVVH-胆红素吸附疗法是一种新型有效的人工肝支持治疗。可显著降低患者胆红素水平,改善生化检查指标及部分临床症状,且患者耐受性好。相较血浆分离灌流方法(常规法),其对患者的白蛋白及凝血功能无影响,且可改善患者APACHEII及肝功能MELD评分,是一种值得在临床推广应用的人工肝支持治疗方法。

Abstract:

Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of combined CVVH-bilirubin adsorption treatment on patients with hyperbilirubinemia and compare to the traditional plasma separation perfusion. Methodology: Sixteen cases with hyperbilirubinemia received total 55 sessions artificial liver support therapy (ALS). All of them were treated with conventional plasma perfusion (conventional method) for the first treatment. The rate of blood flow was set at100-120ml/min and the rate of plasma separated was set at 30-40ml/min. Then they were treated with combined CVVH-bilirubin adsorption (combination method).The rate of blood flow was set at 200-250ml/min and the rate of plasma separated was set at 90ml/min. Separated blood plasma components were filtrated by the CVVH filter AV600 when ultrafiltration rate was set at 66ml/min. Then concentrated plasma components were adsorpted by BRS-350 adsorption column and they were reinfusioned in vivo. At the same time bicarbonate replacement fluid at the speed of 4000ml/hr with pre-dilution mode was input before plasma component separator EC40W. ALS was performed with 8 hours. Blood biochemistry and coagulation were measured before and after single treatment. Similarly blood biochemistry, plasma biochemistry before plasma separator and plasma biochemistry before and after BRS- 350 were measured at the 30min, 2hr, 4hr, 6hr and 8hr of therapy. The clinical vital signs were recorded, and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHEII), Glasgow coma score, MELD score of liver function before and after single treatment were assessed. Results: The average reduction rate of TBL, DBL, IDBL, and TBA were (46.1 ± 8.3)%, (47.3 ± 8.0)%, (40.7 ± 24.8)%, and (36.5 ± 5.2)%, respectively, with the conventional method after single treatment and the reduction rate of TBL, DBL, IDBL, and TBA were (54.4 ± 5.2)%, (54.2 ± 5.3)%, (63.8 ± 7.2)%,  and (47.6 ± 14.7)%, respectively, with combined CVVH-bilirubin adsorption after single treatment. The clearance of TBL were (22.3 ± 2.2), (12.2 ± 4.4), and (9.0 ± 2.8) ml/min, respectively, with the conventional treatment at the 0.5h, 2h, and 4h therapy. The clearance of TBL were (28.7 ± 13.1), (21.9 ± 9.1), (16.1 ± 4.3) ml/min respectively, with combination treatment, at the time corresponding to conventional treatment. At the end of treatment, the clearance of TBL were (8.3 ± 3.0) and (9.3 ± 4.1) ml/min, respectively. The clearance of TBL, DBL, and IDBL was decreased with time on the course of treatment weather combined CVVH- bilirubin adsorption or conventional treatment. The concentration of on total protein (TP) , albumin (ALB) were lower than before treatment and APTT, PT, and INR were longer with conventional treatment. But blood BUN, Scr, ALT, and AST were decreased and there were no effect on TP, ALB and coagulation with combination method after single treatment. The survival rate was 69% in ICU at 30 day and 56% in discharging from hospital. During the treatment, the vital signs of all patients were stable and there were no adverse events.  Conclusion: The combined CVVH-bilirubin adsorption therapy is a novel and effective artificial liver support therapy. It can significantly reduce bilirubin levels, improve the biochemical indexes and relieve some clinical symptoms. Moreover it is well tolerated for patients and there were no effect on serum albumin and coagulation. It can improve MELD score of liver function and APACHEII.