ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 114-120.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-298X.2025.02.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

双重滤过血浆置换和免疫吸附治疗抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关血管炎伴严重肾脏损伤的临床疗效分析

  

  • 出版日期:2025-04-28 发布日期:2025-05-07

Double filtration plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis with severe kidney injury

  • Online:2025-04-28 Published:2025-05-07

摘要: 目的:探讨双重滤过血浆置换(DFPP)和免疫吸附(IA)对严重肾脏损伤抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(ANCA)相关性血管炎(AAV)的疗效及预后的影响。
方法:回顾性收集2022年1月至2024年1月在国家肾脏疾病临床医学研究中心确诊为AAV且估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR) <30 mL/(min·1.73m2)的患者27例,分为DFPP治疗组(DFPP组,n=10),IA治疗组(IA组,n=8)和标准激素+免疫抑制剂治疗组(对照组,n=9)。分析三组患者基线情况、12月患者的生存率、肾脏存活率及疾病缓解率。
结果:三组患者一般情况差异无统计学意义。随访12月,无一例患者死亡,Kaplan-Meier曲线显示三组患者肾脏存活率与疾病缓解率均无差异(χ2=4.668,P=0.097;χ2=0.296,P=0.862)。与治疗前相比,三组患者治疗1月后的血清肌酐(SCr)、伯明翰血管炎活动性评分(BVAS)显著下降,eGFR显著上升,但以上指标变化百分比组间比较差异无统计学意义。三组患者治疗1月后髓过氧化物酶(MPO)-ANCA滴度明显降低,其中IA组较对照组下降率有差异(P=0.025),其余两组组间比较无差异。随访12月,三组患者不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.847)。
结论:DFPP和IA均能有效治疗AAV,有降低进展为终末期肾病风险的趋势。两种模式的短期疗效、安全性及12月的预后无明显差异,DFPP治疗过程中纤维蛋白原显著下降,而IA对纤维蛋白原的影响则较小,DFPP治疗过程中需重点关注凝血指标,避免出血风险。


关键词: 抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关血管炎, 双重滤过血浆置换, 免疫吸附

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the efficacy and prognosis of double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and immunoadsorption (IA) in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) with severe kidney injury.
Methodology:Twenty-seven patients diagnosed with AAV and with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/(min·1.73m2) were retrospectively collected from January 2022 to January 2024 at the National Clinical Medical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated to the Medical College of Nanjing University, and were divided into DFPP treatment group (DFPP group, n=10), IA treatment group (IA group, n=8) and standard hormone and immunosuppressant treatment group (the control group, n=9).The baseline conditions of the three groups, 12-month survival rates, renal survival rates and disease remission rates were analyzed.
Results:There was no statistical difference in the general condition of the three groups. At 12 months of follow-up, no patient died in any of the three groups. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no difference in renal survival rates or disease remission rates among the three groups of patients(χ2=4.668,P=0.097;χ2=0.296,P=0.862). Compared with pre-treatment, serum creatinine (SCr) and Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) significantly decreased in all three groups after 1 month of treatment while eGFR significantly increased.However, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage change of the above indexes between groups. MPO-ANCA titers decreased significantly after 1 month of treatment in the three groups, with a difference in the decline rate between the IA group and the control group (P=0.025), but no significant difference was observed between the other two groups. At 12 months of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups (P=0.847).
Conclusion:Both DFPP and IA can effectively treat AAV, showing a trend toward reducing the risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease. There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy, safety, and prognosis at 12 months between the two modalities. Fibrinogen decreased significantly during DFPP treatment, whereas IA had a lesser effect on fibrinogen, and it is necessary to focus on coagulation indexes during DFPP treatment to avoid the risk of hemorrhage.

Key words: anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, double filtration plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption