ISSN 1006-298X      CN 32-1425/R

导航

肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 228-231.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清胱抑素C对老年肾功能评估的价值

  

  • 出版日期:2012-06-28 发布日期:2012-06-25

Significance of serum cystatin C in evaluation of kidney function for elderly Chinese

  • Online:2012-06-28 Published:2012-06-25

摘要:

摘 要  目的:探讨血清胱抑素C(Cystatin C,CysC)在老年人肾功能评估中的意义。 方法:选取2009年12月至2010年12月在南京医科大学第一附属医院就诊的318例患者为研究对象,以60岁为界,将其分为非老年组和老年组。使用99mTc-DTPA清除率作为肾小球滤过率(GFR)参考值,同时用氧化酶法测定血清肌酐(SCr),颗粒增强免疫比浊法测定CysC。分别运用Spearman线性相关分析、受试者工作曲线下面积(ROCAUC)、多元线性回归分析及对早期慢性肾脏病(CKD)检出率等统计方法,对CysC和SCr进行比较分析。 结果:CysC与GFR的相关性及其诊断CKD的ROCAUC和敏感度都明显高于SCr;CysC在CKD2期和3期中对CKD患者的检出率明显高于SCr,以上优势在老年人群中体现得更明显;回归分析结果显示SCr受性别的影响明显(P<0.01),具有统计学意义,而CysC与GFR均与性别无关。 结论:CysC能准确反映GFR,与SCr相比,CysC受干扰因素少,可更敏感并可靠地筛查出CKD患者;当该指标应用于评估老年人群肾功能时,CysC的优势更加明显。

关键词:  肾小球滤过率  , 血清胱抑素 C  , 血清肌酐  , 老年人
 

Abstract:

ABSTRACT    Objective:Cystatin C (CysC)has been recognized as an alternative marker to serum creatinine (SCr). However, whether CysC would be superior to SCr in Chinese population, especially in elderly, has been rarely compared, referring to glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The objective of this study was to assess diagnostic significance of serum CysC in evaluation of kidney function for elderly Chinese. Methodology:99mTc-DTPA clearance was measured as reference GFR (rGFR). SCr was determined using enzymatic method and CysC was assayed by particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetry assay. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to explore the association between kidney function markers and rGFR. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC) was measured to compare diagnostic accuracy of the two markers. The detection rate of CKD in mild impaired kidney function stage was analyzed to compare the sensitivity of markers. Linear regression analysis was applied to clarify the influence factors of the markers. Results: A total of three hundred and eighteen Chinese participants (18~95y, mean age 52.95 ± 17.13yr) were enrolled. There was significantly better diagnostic accuracy and more sensitivity with CysC than that with SCr: relationship with GFR (-0.807 vs -0.650), AUCROC (0.867 vs 0.772) and sensitivity (0.88 vs. 0.56) for predicting CKD or the detection rate of CKD patients in CKD stage 2 (4.83% vs 0.69%) and stage 3 (72.58% vs 46.77%). Moreover, these merits were more distinctly observed in elderly participants. Linear regression analysis manifested SCr was affected by gender (P < 0.05); however, CysC, in conformity with GFR, was out of this influence. Conclusions: CysC may accurately predict GFR. In comparison with SCr, CysC could be more sensitive and reliable to screen CKD patients with less influence factors. Furthermore, this superiority of CysC may be more remarkable when applied for elderly participants.

 

Key words: Key Words  , glomerular filtration rate  , Cystatin C   , creatinine   , elderly