Chinese Journal of Nephrology, Dialysis & Transplantation ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 513-518.
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Abstract Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics, renal histological features and the prognosis in patients of Class II LN with nephrotic syndrome. Methodology: One hundred twenty four cases(112 females,12 males,mean age 29.22±11.4 years) of LN class II were divided into nephritic syndrome group (NS, n=27) and non-NS group (n=97). The degree of mesangial proliferation was graded into normal (M0)、mild (M1)、moderate (M2) and severe (M3). Diffuse foot process effacement was defined as more than 50% of the glomerular capillary loops showing foot process effacement by EM. Clinical, immunological, pathological features and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results: No significant differences in gender, onset age, LN duration, and SLE duration were found between the two groups. Compared with non-NS group, the patients with NS group had a much higher incidence of renal manifestations as the first onset symptom (77.8% vs 15.5%, P<0.01) and acute kidney injury (29.6% vs 0, P<0.01), but much lower incidence of malar rash (40.7% vs 69.1%, P<0.01), fever (14.8%vs62.9%,P<0.01), arthritis (29.6% vs 75.3%, P<0.01), hematuria (0 vs 34%,p<0.01) and serum anti-dsDNA positivity (29.6% vs 52.6%, P<0.05). In renal histology, the NS group had less severe mesangial proliferation (M2+M3: 7.4% vs 59.8%,P<0.01), but significantly higher incidence of diffuse foot process effacement (88.9% vs 0,P<0.01) than that in non-NS group. Remission rate showed no differences between the two groups (100% vs 98.4%, P>0.05), but the recurrence rate was much higher in NS group than that in non-NS group (69.9% vs 33.3%, P<0.01), and no patient progressed to end stage renal failure after the follow-up for 8-125 months (median 55 months) and 6-274 months(median 57 months) respectively. Repeated renal biopsy in 7 patients (2 in NS group and 5 in non-NS group) after relapsing showed no histological transformation in the NS group, while all five patients in the non-NS group showed histological transformation (2 to class III, one to class IV,V and V+IV respectively). Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that the nephrotic “class II” LN is a podocyte disease which should be differentiated from the class II LN with mesangial proliferation. Further studies are needed to explore the pathogenesis of podocyte injury in SLE.
LIU Jin, CHEN Hui-ping, ZENG Cai-hong,et al. Class II Lupus nephritis with nephrotic syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, Dialysis & Transplantation, 2012, 21(6): 513-518.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.njcndt.com/EN/
http://www.njcndt.com/EN/Y2012/V21/I6/513